Single-nucleotide mutation matrix: a new model for predicting the NF-κB DNA binding sites

PLoS One. 2014 Jul 3;9(7):e101490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101490. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

In this study, we established a single nucleotide mutation matrix (SNMM) model based on the relative binding affinities of NF-κB p50 homodimer to a wild-type binding site (GGGACTTTCC) and its all single-nucleotide mutants detected with the double-stranded DNA microarray. We evaluated this model by scoring different groups of 10-bp DNA sequences with this model and analyzing the correlations between the scores and the relative binding affinities detected with three wet experiments, including the electrophoresis mobility shift assay (EMSA), the protein-binding microarray (PBM) and the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment-sequencing (SELEX-Seq). The results revealed that the SNMM scores were strongly correlated with the detected binding affinities. We also scored the DNA sequences with other three models, including the principal coordinate (PC) model, the position weight matrix scoring algorithm (PWMSA) model and the Match model, and analyzed the correlations between the scores and the detected binding affinities. In comparison with these models, the SNMM model achieved reliable results. We finally determined 0.747 as the optimal threshold for predicting the NF-κB DNA-binding sites with the SNMM model. The SNMM model thus provides a new alternative model for scoring the relative binding affinities of NF-κB to the 10-bp DNA sequences and predicting the NF-κB DNA-binding sites.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Base Sequence
  • Binding Sites
  • DNA / chemistry
  • DNA / metabolism*
  • Dimerization
  • Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
  • Models, Molecular
  • Mutation
  • NF-kappa B / chemistry
  • NF-kappa B / metabolism*
  • Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
  • Protein Binding

Substances

  • NF-kappa B
  • DNA

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61171030) and the Technology Support Program of Jiangsu (BE2012741). The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.