Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 11;10(6):e0129350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129350. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Multiplexing samples in sequencing experiments is a common approach to maximize information yield while minimizing cost. In most cases the number of samples that are multiplexed is determined by financial consideration or experimental convenience, with limited understanding on the effects on the experimental results. Here we set to examine the impact of multiplexing ChIP-seq experiments on the ability to identify a specific epigenetic modification. We performed peak detection analyses to determine the effects of multiplexing. These include false discovery rates, size, position and statistical significance of peak detection, and changes in gene annotation. We found that, for histone marker H3K4me3, one can multiplex up to 8 samples (7 IP + 1 input) at ~21 million single-end reads each and still detect over 90% of all peaks found when using a full lane for sample (~181 million reads). Furthermore, there are no variations introduced by indexing or lane batch effects and importantly there is no significant reduction in the number of genes with neighboring H3K4me3 peaks. We conclude that, for a well characterized antibody and, therefore, model IP condition, multiplexing 8 samples per lane is sufficient to capture most of the biological signal.

MeSH terms

  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing*
  • Histones / chemistry
  • Histones / genetics
  • Histones / metabolism
  • Humans
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA*

Substances

  • Histones

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.